Legal Opinion
Purdue Pharma, L.P. v. F.H. Faulding & Co.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided April 23, 1999No. Civ.A. 96-427-JJFPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FARNAN, Chief Judge.
INTRODUCTION
This action was brought by Purdue Pharma L.P. and The Purdue Frederick Company (collectively, “Purdue”) against Faulding Inc., Faulding Pharmaceutical Co., Faulding Services, Inc., Purepac Pharmaceutical Co. (collectively, “Fauld-ing”) and Zeneca, Inc. (“Zeneca”) for infringement of U.S. Patent Number 5,672,-360 (the “ ’360 Patent”). The ’360 Patent issued to Purdue on September 30, 1997, and claims methods for-effectively treating pain by administering to an individual patient on a 24-hour basis an oral opioid formulation, in this case…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re JP Morgan Chase Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Bayer AG v. Sony Electronics, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2002
- Inline Connection Corp. v. Earthlink, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2010