Legal Opinion
Rodriguez v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
Decided November 17, 1994No. 13-93-340-CRPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GILBERTO HINOJOSA, Justice.
A jury found appellant, Jose Angel Rodriguez, guilty of possession of a usable quantity of marijuana in an amount of more than fifty pounds but less than two hundred pounds. The jury assessed punishment at ten years probation. By three points of error, appellant complains that the evidence is insufficient to support the conviction. We affirm.
In the early morning hours of December 15, 1992, Border Patrol agents, on duty in the Santa Maria area of Hidalgo County, Texas, received notification that one of the sensors located near the Rio Grande River had sounded.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Moreno v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Adelman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Stone v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Meraz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Clewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Cantu v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1997
- Hicks Ex Rel. Union Pacific Corp. v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2003
- Armando Grimaldo v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2021
- Carey Lee Cramer v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2008
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.