Legal Opinion

Madali Inc. v. Brooms

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided January 29, 1991Published

1Opinion of the Court

*715OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Judgment unanimously reversed with $30 costs and petition dismissed.

Tenants entered into possession of this apartment at a time when they enjoyed the protection of the Emergency Tenant Protection Act of 1974. One of the tenants became an employee of the petitioner and this employment status terminated in early 1988. Upon termination of such employment status, the relationship of landlord and tenant arose once again (see, Rasch, 1 New York Landlord and Tenant — Summary Proceedings §§ 4:7, 4:9 [3d ed]; id., vol 2, § 31:1 et seq; see also, Yui Woon Kwong v Guido,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stern v. . Equitable Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1924
  2. Jaroslow v. Lehigh Valley RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. Yui Woon Kwong v. GuidoCivil Court of the City of New York · 1985
  4. Gabor v. FeldmanCivil Court of the City of New York · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API