Legal Opinion

Axilbund v. McAllister

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 13, 1962No. Appeal, 341PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Benjamin R. Jones,

This appeal challenges the propriety of the entry by the court below of a judgment n.o.v. in an assumpsit action instituted for the recovery of a real estate broker’s commission.

Lanard & Axilbund (Axilbund) is a partnership engaged in the real estate business in Philadelphia. 917 Filbert Street Corporation (Filbert), of which D. Edward McAllister was the president and principal stockholder, was the owner of a building located at 24th and Locust Streets, Philadelphia. On September 24,1957, Filbert sold that building to one Julius Gross for $295,000.

Axilbu…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Foley v. the Pittsburgh-Des Moines Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  2. Kuhns v. BruggerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  3. Keys v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1871
  4. Clark v. Prov. Tr. Co., TrusteeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  5. Earp v. CumminsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1867

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Eldridge v. MelcherSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Mike v. Borough of AliquippaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Handfinger v. Philadelphia Gas WorksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  4. Merion Spring Co. v. Muelles Hnos. Garcia Torres, S.A.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Canery v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API