Legal Opinion

Carley v. Dept. Of the Army

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided June 28, 2005No. 2004-3300Published

1Opinion of the Court

Error: Bad annotation destination United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 04-3300 MICHAEL CARLEY, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY Respondent. Neil C. Bonney, Bonney & Allenberg, PC, of Virginia Beach, Virginia, for petitioner. Joshua E. Gardner, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, for respondent. With him on the brief were Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, David M. Cohen, Director, and Robert E. Kirschman, Jr., Assistant Director. Of counsel on the brief was Daniel M. Kininmonth,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Bender v. Williamsport Area School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API