Legal Opinion

Denend v. Bradford Roofing & Insulation

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1985No. 85-72PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gulbrandson

Bradford Roofing and Insulation (Bradford), the employer, and Glacier General Assurance Company, the defendant, appeal the Workers’ Compensation Court’s award of temporary total disability benefits to James Denend (claimant). The issue is whether substantial evidence supports the lower court’s ruling that claimant’s benefits should be based on a forty hour work week. We affirm.

In September 1983, Tony Ludwig, a Bradford foreman, contacted the State Job Service office in Missoula, Montana, seeking to hire workers. Ludwig testified that he told the Job Service that the job would be part-time…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Steffes v. 93 Leasing Co., Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Bond v. St. Regis Paper Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Hutchison v. General Host Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Byrd v. Ramsey EngineeringMontana Supreme Court · 1985

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Loney v. Milodragovich, Dale & Dye, P.C.Montana Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Pengra v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Perry v. Tomahawk TransportationMontana Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Milender v. CarpenterMontana Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Torres v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API