Legal Opinion
Doe v. Hartford Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided April 15, 1998No. File CV970402793PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
I
INTRODUCTION
FRACASSE, J.
Presently before the court is the motion to strike the first, second and third counts of the complaint of the plaintiff, Jane Doe. The motion is filed by the defendants, the Hartford Roman Catholic Diocesan Corporation, the Church of the Holy Spirit and Father John T. O’Connor. The motion should be granted as to the first count and denied as to the second and third counts.
The plaintiff filed this action on July 28,1997, alleging, in an eight count complaint, that she had suffered injury and damages due to the intentional and negligent acts of the defendants, Father…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Novametrix Medical Systems, Inc. v. BOC Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Byrd v. FaberOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- Faulkner v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Waters v. AutuoriSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- A-G Foods, Inc. v. Pepperidge Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- N.H. v. Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.)Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- Doe v. Norwich Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2003
- Jane Doe I v. MalickiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
- Doe v. Norwich Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2004
- Doe v. Hartford Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.