Legal Opinion

Clarkson v. Laiblan

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 2, 1919Published

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis; —Hon. J. Hugo Grimm, Judge. (1) The allegata and probata must correspond.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis; —Hon. J. Hugo Grimm, Judge. (1) The allegata and probata must correspond. Reed v. Bobb, 100 Mo. 62; Dorothy v. Atkins, 78 Mo. 186; Baldwin v. Whaley, 81 Mo. 416; Ross v. Ross, 81 Mo. 84; Newan v. Kenton, 79 Mo. 3827 (2) Associations and clubs, the object of which are social or political, and not for purposes of trade or profit, are not partnerships, and pecuniary liability can be fixed upon the individual members of such associations only . by reason of the acts of such individuals or of their agents, and the agency must be made —none is…

1Opinion of the Court

BIGGS, C.

This is a damage action originally filed by James L. Clarkson against the defendants-appellants, and Patrick Garvey, John Lyons and John F. Scarry, officers and members of a labor organization known as Local Union 'No. 1 of the International Brotherhood of Composition Roofers, Damp & Waterproof Workers of St. Louis and vicinity. By reason of the death of Garvey, Lyons and Scarry the suit against them was dismissed.

•Plaintiff is a journeyman roofer by occupation, and the defendants are officers of the said roofers union which organization is affiliated with the central organization…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Curran v. . GalenNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  2. Lohse Patent Door Co. v. FuelleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  3. Carter v. OsterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1908
  4. Clarkson v. LaiblanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1913
  5. Clarkson v. GarveyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API