Legal Opinion
United States v. Burleson
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Decided December 15, 1954No. Cr. 15658, 15659PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT L. TAYLOR, District Judge.
In each of these cases, the defendant has filed a motion to dismiss the indictment on the ground that the same, when read with the bill of particulars, does not charge facts sufficient to constitute violations of the statutes alleged to have been violated. In both cases the indictments charge violation of Title 18 U.S.C.A. §§ 602 and 603. In the Burleson case, the indictment also charges violation of section 606. Whether the indictments are sufficient depends upon interpretation of the sections mentioned, with particular attention to their decisive terms.
In…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Church of the Holy Trinity v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- McBoyle v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- United States v. KirbySupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- United States v. KeitelSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- United States v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Gabel v. LermaCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1990
- City of Tullahoma, Tennessee v. Coffee County, TennesseeDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1962
- Kentucky Utilities Co. v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1964
- Kentucky Utilities Co. v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966
- Den Gre Plastics Co., Inc. v. Travelers Indem.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.