Legal Opinion

Lattimore v. Corrections Cabinet

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 8, 1990No. 89-CA-2304-MRPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from an order of the Oldham Circuit Court, entered October 17, 1989, denying appellant’s pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus.

Appellant complains that the application of KRS 533.060(2) to his sentences constitutes an ex post facto law in violation of Article I, Section 10 of the United States Constitution. KRS 533.060(2) reads in pertinent part:

When a person has been convicted of a felony and is committed to a correctional facility ... and released on parole ... and is convicted or enters a plea of guilty to a felony committed while on parole, ... the period of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Miller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Lindsey v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. Riley v. ParkeKentucky Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Wethington v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1977

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hyatt v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Garland v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1999
  3. Martinez v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Lozier v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2000
  5. Kassulke v. Briscoe-WadeKentucky Supreme Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API