Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Garland v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided August 20, 1999No. 1998-CA-001653-MRPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SCHRODER, Judge.

This is an appeal from a ruling of the Fayette Circuit Court. Following a plea of guilty to several sex-related charges, the court found the appellant was an eligible sexual offender under KRS 197.410 and ordered him to complete the Sexual Offender Treatment Program, mandated by KRS 197.400, before he would be considered for parole pursuant to KRS 439.340(11). The appellant argues the trial court improperly enhanced his sentence pursuant to KRS 197.400, KRS 197.410, and KRS 439.340(11) and the statutes violate ex post facto laws when applied in this case. We disagree…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Belcher v. Kentucky Parole BoardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1996
  3. Commonwealth v. Polsgrove, County JudgeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  4. Lynch v. WingoCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1968
  5. Lattimore v. Corrections CabinetCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1990

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PridhamKentucky Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Martin v. ChandlerKentucky Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Stewart v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Purvis v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Pate v. Department of CorrectionsKentucky Supreme Court · 2015

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API