Legal Opinion
King v. Allied Vision, Ltd.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 25, 1994No. 92 Civ. 3852 (CBM)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
MOTLEY, District Judge.
Plaintiff Stephen King (“King”) moves for an order to hold defendant New Line Cinema Corporation (“New Line”) in contempt of court for violating the Final Consent Decree settling the promotion and distribution of the “The Lawnmower Man” videocassette. Defendant, in turn, has cross-moved for sanctions and attorneys fees. Plaintiff has also filed a post-trial motion under Rule 11 of the Fed.R.Civ.P. against defendant seeking sanctions for maintaining a frivolous defense and filing a frivolous cross-motion.
For the following reasons, plaintiff’s contempt…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Local Number 93, International Ass'n of Firefighters v. City of ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firefighters Local Union No. 1784 v. StottsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Eastway Construction Corp. v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Leman v. Krentler-Arnold Hinge Last Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Fendi Adele S.R.L. v. Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Chere Amie, Inc. v. Windstar Apparel, Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Scottish Air International, Inc. v. British Caledonian Group, PLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Figueroa v. DeanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Upjohn Co. v. Medtron Laboratories, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.