Legal Opinion
Tomanio v. Board of Regents
New York Court of Appeals
Decided November 20, 1975PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order affirmed, without costs. The refusal of the Board of Regents to waive the examination required by statute was not, as a matter of law, an abuse of discretion. (Education Law, § 6506, subd [5]; § 6554, subd [4]; see, also, Matter of Levi v Regents of Univ. of State of N. Y., 256 App Div 444, affd 281 NY 627.)
Concur: Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Fuchsberg. Taking no part: Judge Cooke.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Erlanger v. Regents of UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
- Matter of Levi v. Regents of the Univ. of State of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1939
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kirchgessner v. HurlbutAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Castelle v. Commissioner of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Karasik v. Board of RegentsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- McDonagh v. AmbachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Tomanio v. Board of Regents of University of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.