van den Berk v. Missouri Commission on Human Rights
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JAMES R. DOWD, Judge.
Carolena van den Berk appeals from the judgment of the St. Louis City Circuit Court affirming the decision of the Missouri Commission on Human Rights, which found van den Berk in violation of the Missouri Human Rights Act, § 213.040 RSMo 1994. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
FACTS
In response to a newspaper advertisement, Donyale Austin called van den Berk to inquire about the availability of a two-bedroom apartment listed for rent at 6261 Clemens in a building owned by van den Berk. In a brief conversation, van den Berk indicated that she did not racially…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Havens Realty Corp. v. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Midstate Oil Co. v. Missouri Commission on Human RightsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
- Heights Community Congress v. Hilltop Realty, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- H.S. v. Board of Regents, Southeast Missouri State UniversityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Delise diaz v. Autozoners, LLC, D/B/A AutozoneMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
- State ex rel. Sir v. Gateway Taxi Management Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- Wilkins v. Board of RegentsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
- Vermett v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- Amended August 25, 2017 Tina Haskenhoff v. Homeland Energy Solutions, LLCSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.