Legal Opinion
In re Brownstone
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 2, 1936PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COXE, District Judge.
These are specifications of objection to a bankrupt’s discharge which were filed by three creditors; they were referred to a referee for hearing and report; and the referee has reported that none of the specifications has been sustained, and has recommended that a discharge be granted. The bankrupt asks for the confirmation of the report; the objecting creditors challenge its correctness and oppose confirmation.
The specifications as originally filed were extremely voluminous; a considerable number were either withdrawn or dismissed by the referee; and the remainder charge…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Morimura, Arai & Co. v. TabackSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Gerdes v. LustgartenSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- International Harvester Co. of America v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1914
- In re HughesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919
- In re MaagetDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1911
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re MonschDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1937
- In re LevineDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1939