Legal Opinion
Randolph v. Grange Mutual Casualty Co.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided December 22, 2009No. 09AP-519PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
French, Presiding Judge.
{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, James Randolph, appeals the judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, entering summary judgment in favor of defendant-appellee, Grange Mutual Casualty Company, on Randolph’s claims for interference with his rights under the Family Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”), Section 2601, Title 29, U.S.Code, and for intentional infliction of emotional distress. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
{¶ 2} Randolph initially filed an action against Grange on December 2, 2004, alleging claims for retaliation under the FMLA and intentional infliction…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
- Murphy v. City of ReynoldsburgOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- Brown v. Scioto Cty. Bd. of Commrs.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
- Daniel R. Arban, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. West Publishing Corp., Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Davis v. Byers VolvoOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- Hull v. Astro Shapes, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011
- Hilbert v. Ohio Dept. of Transp.Ohio Court of Claims · 2016
- Taylor v. Ohio Dept. of Jobs & Family Servs.Ohio Court of Claims · 2011
- Taylor v. Ohio Dept. of Jobs & Family Servs.Ohio Court of Claims · 2011