Legal Opinion
In re Extradition Omar Ameen
District Court, E.D. California
Decided May 6, 2019No. 2:18-mj-152-EFBPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
EDMUND F. BRENNAN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Omar Abdulsattar Ameen1 ("Ameen") has, through his counsel, filed: (1) a motion for the production of search warrants (ECF No. 111 ); (2) a motion for protective order (ECF No. 112 ); and (3) a motion to compel (ECF No. 116 ). The government has filed an opposition addressing each motion (ECF No. 120 ) and Ameen has filed a reply thereto (ECF No. 123 ).2 The court, for the reasons stated hereafter, denies the motion to compel and motion for production of search warrants. The motion for protective order is granted in part.3
Motion to Compel
I.…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Kamakana v. City and County of HonoluluCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Debbie Foltz, Consumer Action United Policyholders Texas Watch, Intervenors, and Tierney Adamson Kevin Snead Daniel P. Johnson, Intervenors-Appellants. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, an Illinois Corporation California Institute of Medical Research & Technology, Inc., a Foreign Corporation Dba Comprehensive Medical Review Ralph Householder Steven Becker v. April Jean Ho Jim Mathis, Plaintiffs-Intervenors. Debbie Foltz, and Tierney Adamson Kevin Snead Daniel P. Johnson, Intervenors-Appellants v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, an Illinois Corporation, and California Institute of Medical Research & Technology, Inc., a Foreign Corporation Dba Comprehensive Medical Review Ralph Householder Steven Becker v. April Jean Ho Jim Mathis, Plaintiffs-Intervenors. Debbie Foltz, April J. Ho Jim Mathis Tierney Adamson Kevin Snead Daniel P. Johnson, Intervenors, and Consumer Action United Policy-Holders Texas Watch, Intervenors-Appellants v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, an Illinois Corporation, and Steven BeckerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- (HC) Martinez Santoyo v. BoydenDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023