Legal Opinion

Minnesota Mutual Fire & Casualty Co. v. Rudzinski

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 15, 1984No. C3-84-96PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

Constance Rudzinski appeals a judgment in favor of Minnesota Mutual Fire and Casualty Company entered on stipulated facts. Minnesota Mutual brought suit to recover benefits paid to Rudzinski and to a hospital on her behalf under the Minnesota No-Fault Act. The trial court concluded that the benefits had been paid as the result of a mutual mistake and that Minnesota Mutual was entitled to recover. Rudzinski contends that (1) the trial court erred in concluding that there was a mutual mistake of law and fact, (2) the insurer waived any right to reimbursement and is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Shannon v. Great American Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. Gartner v. EikillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. Wallace v. Tri-State Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  4. Feick Ex Rel. Feick v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  5. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. BachrachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Pedersen v. United Services Automobile Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  2. Transamerica Insurance Company v. International Broadcasting CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
  3. Winthrop & Weinstine v. Travelers Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1998
  4. Programmed Land, Inc. v. O'CONNORCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
  5. Transamerica Insurance v. International Broadcasting Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API