Minnesota Mutual Fire & Casualty Co. v. Rudzinski
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANSING, Judge.
Constance Rudzinski appeals a judgment in favor of Minnesota Mutual Fire and Casualty Company entered on stipulated facts. Minnesota Mutual brought suit to recover benefits paid to Rudzinski and to a hospital on her behalf under the Minnesota No-Fault Act. The trial court concluded that the benefits had been paid as the result of a mutual mistake and that Minnesota Mutual was entitled to recover. Rudzinski contends that (1) the trial court erred in concluding that there was a mutual mistake of law and fact, (2) the insurer waived any right to reimbursement and is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Shannon v. Great American Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Gartner v. EikillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Wallace v. Tri-State Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Feick Ex Rel. Feick v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. BachrachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Pedersen v. United Services Automobile Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Transamerica Insurance Company v. International Broadcasting CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Winthrop & Weinstine v. Travelers Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1998
- Programmed Land, Inc. v. O'CONNORCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- Transamerica Insurance v. International Broadcasting Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.