Legal Opinion

State v. Walker

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 2000No. M1996-00046-SC-R11-CDPublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BIRCH, Jr., Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

The statute pertinent here provides that an officer who observes the commission of certain misdemeanors must cite and release the misdemeanant rather than effecting a custodial arrest. 1 There are, however, exceptions to this statute. The exception relevant here authorizes an officer to effect a custodial arrest of a misde-meanant when that person “cannot or will not offer satisfactory evidence of identification ....” 2

We accepted review to clarify the “identification exception” to our “cite and release” statute. To clarify this exception, we must…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. State v. YearganTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  5. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. League of United Latin American Citizens v. BredesenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  2. State v. BerriosTennessee Supreme Court · 2007
  3. STATE of Tennessee v. Marcus RICHARDSTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State of Tennessee v. Wayne DonaldsonTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
  5. State v. JacksonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2008

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API