Legal Opinion
Bobosky v. Adidas AG
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided December 29, 2011No. CV 10-630-PKPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
PAPAK, United States Magistrate Judge:
Plaintiffs W. Brand Bobosky and We Not Me, Ltd. (collectively “Bobosky” or “plaintiffs”) bring this action against defendants adidas America, Inc., adidas AG, 180LA, LLC, NBA Properties, Inc., NBA Media Ventures, LLC, and Kevin Garnett (collectively “adidas” or “defendants”) arising out of defendants’ use of the phrase “WE NOT ME” during a 2007 “Basketball is a Brotherhood” marketing campaign. Bobosky alleges claims for trademark in*1136fringement and unfair competition, based on his two federal trademark registrations of “WE NOT ME.” (Third…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Brookfield Communications, Inc. v. West Coast Entertainment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- William Earl Warren III v. City of Carlsbad Brian Watson James Thompson Frank Mannen Raymond Patchett Stewart Gary Ann JansenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kelly Services, Inc. v. Creative Harbor, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2015
- Kelly Services, Inc. v. Creative Harbor, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2015
- Sterling Computers Corporation v. International Business Machines CorporationDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2025
- The Pennsylvania State University v. Vintage Brand, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
- Weems Industries, Inc. v. Teknor Apex CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2023