Legal Opinion

Interstate Trust & Banking Co. v. Young

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 8, 1914No. 19986PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Seventeenth Judicial District Court, Parish of Vermillion; John Nugier, Judge ad hoc. Action by the Interstate Trust & Banking Company against F. F. Young and others. Frond a judgment granting insufficient relief, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtProvosty, J.

On May 11, 1909, the Fenwick Sanitarium, a corporation, executed a notarial act, in which it declared that it had made its ten promissory notes of even date with the act, to its own order, and by itself indorsed in blank, maturing in one to ten years, the first for $6,000 and the others for $7,500 each, bearing 8 per cent, per annum interest, payable semiannually, and stipulating 10 per cent, attorney’s fees; that it agreed to pay the fees of the attorney who might be employed to collect said notes, or any one of them, in case of nonpayment at maturity, said fees being fixed at 10 per cent,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pepper v. DunlapSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1840
  2. McGuire v. WooldridgeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1843
  3. Durac v. FerrariSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1873
  4. In re Dimmick's EstateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
  5. Bringier v. GordonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1859

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Central Sav. Bank & Trust Co. v. Oilfield Supply & Scrap Material Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1943
  2. Salter v. WalsworthLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1936
  3. Wyatt v. BuckleyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1937
  4. Utah State Nat. Bank v. LivingstonUtah Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Central Sav. B. T. Co. v. Oil Field Supply S. Mat.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API