Legal Opinion

Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Willson

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1908No. Motion No. 1766PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Motion by the railway company for leave to file application to the Supreme Court for writ of mandamus to require the Court of Civil Appeals for the Sixth District to certify a question on the ground of conflict of decisions.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Gaines

This is a motion to file a petition for the writ of mandamus to compel the judges of the Court of Civil Appeals for the Sixth ''Supreme Judicial District to certify to this court a question arising in the case of the Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Sproles, recently decided in that court, upon the ground that there is a conflict in the decision of the court in that case with decisions of other Courts of Civil Appeals in cases cited.

By an act of the Legislature, approved May 9, 1899, it is provided that “in any cause that is now pending or may hereafter be pending in any of the Courts of Civil…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. HanacekTexas Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Garitty v. RaineyTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Stuart v. MeyerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  3. Coultress v. City of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 1916
  4. McKay v. ConnerTexas Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Warren v. Willson, Chief JusticeTexas Supreme Court · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API