Legal Opinion
General Accident, Fire, & Life Assurance Corp. v. Beatty
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided February 10, 1932No. 8323PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRussell, C. J.
The answer to the first question, as stated in headnote 1 and in subdivisions (a), (b), and (c) thereof, requires no elaboration.
The answer to the second question seems to be controlled by the ruling of this court in Home Accident Ins. Co. v. McNair, 173 Ga. 566 (161 S. E. 131), in which the questions of the Court of Appeals concerned a total loss of the use -of a member. In this case we held, of course, that, under the provisions of section 32 (r) of the workmen’s compensation act (Ga. L. 1920, pp. 167, 185), the awards of the industrial commission are subject to review by that body wherever…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Home Accident Insurance v. McNairSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
- South v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
3Cited by15 opinions
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
- Sears, Roebuck & Company v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
- Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- City of Hapeville v. PrestonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
- National Surety Corp. v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.