Legal Opinion
Finocchio v. Mahler
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided December 5, 2000No. ED 77786PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHARLES B. BLACKMAR, Senior Judge.
The plaintiff sued for damages for the wrongful death of her daughter, Amy Roberts. The defendants moved for summary judgment, supporting the motion by exhibits complying with Rule 74.04(e). The plaintiff responded with similar exhibits. In the view we take of the case it is not neeessaiy to set out the underlying facts in detail, because the uncontroverted facts which we consider determinative are relatively few. In stating the facts we seek to give the plaintiff the benefit of all controverted matters of fact, and of all appropriate inferences that might be…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Martin v. City of WashingtonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- Kuhns v. BruggerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Lopez v. Three Rivers Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2000
- Scheibel v. HillisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- Virginia D. v. Madesco Investment Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Heffernan v. ReinholdMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
- Steinle v. City & County of San FranciscoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2017
- Allen v. KuehnleMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
- Riordan v. Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day SaintsDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2003
- AERICA SIMS, as Administratix of the Estate of JAYCEON SIMS, deceased; and, ROBERT SIMS v. POLARIS, INC.; POLARIS INDUSTRIES, INC.; POLARIS SALES, INC.; and, INDIANA MILLS & MANUFACTURING, INC.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2026
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.