Legal Opinion

Riordan v. Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided January 16, 2003No. 4:96-cv-00002PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER (1) DENYING IN PART AND GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; (2) DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF’S EXPERTS DISCLOSURES; AND (S) AMENDING THE SCHEDULING AND TRIAL ORDER

SMITH, District Judge.

Pending are Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. # 36) and Defendant’s motion to strike two of Plaintiffs expert disclosures (Doc. #40). For the following reasons, Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is denied in part and granted in part, and Defendant’s motion to strike two of Plaintiffs expert disclosures is denied.

I. BACKGROUND

Plaintiff Lamoni…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Farley v. MM Cattle CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Get Away Club, Inc. v. Vic Coleman, Jim SnyderCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
  5. Kanagawa v. State by and Through FreemanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Williams v. Webster County, MissouriDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API