Riordan v. Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints
District Court, W.D. Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER (1) DENYING IN PART AND GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; (2) DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF’S EXPERTS DISCLOSURES; AND (S) AMENDING THE SCHEDULING AND TRIAL ORDER
SMITH, District Judge.
Pending are Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. # 36) and Defendant’s motion to strike two of Plaintiffs expert disclosures (Doc. #40). For the following reasons, Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is denied in part and granted in part, and Defendant’s motion to strike two of Plaintiffs expert disclosures is denied.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Lamoni…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Farley v. MM Cattle CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1975
- Get Away Club, Inc. v. Vic Coleman, Jim SnyderCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- Kanagawa v. State by and Through FreemanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Williams v. Webster County, MissouriDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2023