Whitehurst v. Rogers
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from-'the'Superior Court of Baltimore City. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court, which also set's forth so much of the prayers of the appellant and appellee as is necessary to the understanding of the points involved in the decision.
1Opinion of the CourtBowie, J.
The appellant sued the appellee in the Superior Court of Baltimore City, on the 8th of September, 1871, declar*509ing against him originally in two counts, but afterwards, by leave of the Court, adding a third.
The first charges that the appellant, being tbe manufacturer of a valuable specific, a preparation which at great expense he advertised and caused to be widely known by the name and trade-mark of “Forrest’s Juniper Tar,” by which it had acquired great reputation, etc., and whereby the appellant had acquired a valuable property in said name and trade mark, etc., the appellee well knowing the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Marsh v. PierSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1833
- Cecil v. CecilCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1862
- Betts v. StarrSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1825
- Shafer v. StonebrakerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1832
- Garrott v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1840
3Cited by37 opinions
- Sterling v. Local 438, Liberty Ass'n of Steam & Power Pipe Fitters & Helpers' Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1955
- Bell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1881
- Harryman v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1879
- Southern Minnesota Railway Extension Co. v. St. Paul & S. C. R.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1893
- Barrick v. HornerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1893
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.