Legal Opinion

Hassell-Hughes Lumber Co. v. Jackson

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided March 23, 1949PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSwepston, J.

This is an appeal by defendants from the decree of the Chancellor in a case tried regularly upon oral testimony according to a writted stipulation for same filed in the cause.

The suit is against Jackson and Strait trading as Strait-Jackson Products Company, on account for lumber purchased and delivered, and against Miller and Perry, trading as Milplan Crafts, on their alleged guaranty; Jackson died and the cause has been revived as to his administrator.

The contest is by Miller and Perry as to their liability on the guaranty which is in the form of a letter as follows:

“June 5, 1946
“Hassell &…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Drummond v. Executors of PrestmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  2. Page Trust Co. v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  3. Elgin City Banking Co. v. HallTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
  4. J. R. Watkins Medical Co. v. BrandCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  5. Villines v. Parham-Lindsey Grocery Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1927

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bryant v. Food MacH. & Chem. Corp. Niagara Chem. Div.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
  2. WR Grace & Company v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1965
  3. Squibb v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1997
  4. Maresh Sheet Metal Works v. N. R. G., Ltd.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  5. First National Bank, Hope, Arkansas v. FosterCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1969

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API