Legal Opinion

Squibb v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided February 3, 1997No. 03A01-9609-CH-00291PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McMURRAY, Judge.

This action was instituted by the plaintiffs to recover a pro-rata share of monies they were required to pay on a guaranty agreement wherein the defendants were co-guarantors. The trial court found that there were three co-guarantors, Mr. Squibb, James H. Widener and Ted C. Smith (defendant). He apportioned liability equally among the three. The court found that the purported signature of Ms. Smith on the guaranty agreement was not her signature. The ease was dismissed as to the defendant, Rose E. Smith. No appeal was taken from the action of the comet dismissing the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Otis v. Cambridge Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Farmers-Peoples Bank v. ClemmerTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Bill Walker & Associates, Inc. v. ParrishCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1989
  4. B. F. Myers & Son of Goodlettsville, Inc. v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1980
  5. Toomey v. AtyoeTennessee Supreme Court · 1895

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Stevenson v. J.C. Bradford & Co. (In Re Cannon)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1999
  2. Suntrust Bank, East Tennessee, N.A. v. DorroughCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
  3. Wolff Ardis, P.C. v. Kimball Products, Inc.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2003
  4. First American Title Insurance v. Cumberland County BankDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2009
  5. Andrea D. Bryant v. Phillip Wright, Jr. - ConcurringCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API