Craven v. Coplika
United States District Court
1Opinion of the CourtEggerh, J.
This is an action in dispossession brought by the mortgagee in possession for the premises located at 280 Monmouth street in the city of Jersey City, New Jersey. Plaintiff relies on sections 107, 108 of the District Court act (2 Comp. Stat., p. 1988) and sections 18A and 18B of the Landlord and Tenant act (3 Comp. Stat., pp. 3070, 3071) for her right to maintain this action. Although not specifically stated but argued in plaintiff’s brief, section 26 of the Landlord and Tenant act, supra, is also relied upon. Section 26 reads as follows:
“Nothing herein contained shall extend to vacate or…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Paramount B. L. v. SacksNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930
- Stanton v. Metropolitan Lumber Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930
- Bermes v. KelleyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1931
- Del-New Co. v. JamesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
- Stewart v. Fairchild-Baldwin Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1919
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.