Dunn v. State

Ruffin, Chief Judge.

A jury found Chad Dunn guilty of possessing cocaine. Dunn appeals, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence. He also claims that the trial court erred in admitting his medical records at trial. We affirm.

1. On appeal from a criminal conviction, a defendant no longer enjoys a presumption of innocence. This Court does not weigh the evidence or resolve credibility issues, but merely determines whether the evidence, viewed favorably to the verdict, authorized the jury to find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

Viewed in this manner, the evidence shows that, at…