Legal Opinion

Mull v. McKnight

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1879PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Erom the Washington Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtNiblack, J.

William Mull commenced this action in the court below, against Thomas McKnight, for slander.

The complaint was in three paragraphs.

The defendant answered separately to each paragraph :

I. In general denial;

2. In justification ; and,

8. A former adjudication.

The plaintiff demurred severally to the third paragraphs of the answers to the first and second paragraphs of the complaint, respectively, but his demurrer was overruled.

Issue being joined, there was a trial, a verdict for the .defendant, a motion for a new trial and judgment for the defendant upon the verdict.

The plaintiff has appealed, and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lytle v. LytleIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Campbell v. CrossIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Davenport v. BarnettIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Hardy v. ChipmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Williamson v. ForemanIndiana Supreme Court · 1864

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Goble v. DillonIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Central Union Telephone Co. v. State ex rel. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Ford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  4. Hopper v. LucasIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. State ex rel. Braden v. KrugIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API