Legal Opinion

Ferguson v. Aventis Pasteur, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided March 30, 2006No. Civil Action 05-9-DLBPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER

BUNNING, District Judge.

This case involves a products liability action against certain manufacturers and distributors of thimerosal, a vaccine preservative, and of vaccines containing thim-erosal. The case is before the Court on several pending motions; namely, a Joint Motion to Dismiss by Defendants GlaxoS-mithKline, Merck and Company, Inc., Abbott Laboratories, Wyeth Laboratories, and Aventis Pasteur Inc. (Doc. # 8); Motion to Dismiss by Defendant Eli Lilly Company, Inc. (Doc. # 10); Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike (Doc. #23); Plaintiffs’ Motion to Amend Complaint…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Baron T. Youn Kyong Hwan Choi, D/B/A Ckh Sportsworld, Ltd. v. Track, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  3. United Parcel Service Co. v. RickertKentucky Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Moss v. Merck and CoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
  5. Troxclair v. Aventis Pasteur, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API