Legal Opinion

Moss v. Merck and Co

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided August 16, 2004No. 03-30958PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiffs Scott and Janice Moss (“the Mosses”), the parents of a young child who, they allege, developed autism as a result of receiving vaccines containing mercury, wish to pursue state law tort claims for injuries they suffered as a result of the child’s condition. Although their claims are not barred by the literal terms of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 (the ‘Vaccine Act”), 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-l et seq., defendants urge the alternate theories that the statute is broad enough implicitly to preempt any claims it fails directly to address, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Freightliner Corp. v. MyrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Bass v. Parkwood HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
  4. Head v. Secretary of Department of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. McDonal Ex Rel. McDonal v. Abbott LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
  2. Holder v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
  3. Doe v. Bayer Corp.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2005
  4. In Re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether ("MTBE") Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
  5. Erin Holmes v. Merck & Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API