Moss v. Merck and Co
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiffs Scott and Janice Moss (“the Mosses”), the parents of a young child who, they allege, developed autism as a result of receiving vaccines containing mercury, wish to pursue state law tort claims for injuries they suffered as a result of the child’s condition. Although their claims are not barred by the literal terms of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 (the ‘Vaccine Act”), 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-l et seq., defendants urge the alternate theories that the statute is broad enough implicitly to preempt any claims it fails directly to address, and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Freightliner Corp. v. MyrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Bass v. Parkwood HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- Head v. Secretary of Department of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992
3Cited by11 opinions
- McDonal Ex Rel. McDonal v. Abbott LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
- Holder v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
- Doe v. Bayer Corp.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2005
- In Re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether ("MTBE") Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Erin Holmes v. Merck & Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.