Legal Opinion
Puget Soundkeeper Alliance v. APM Terminals Tacoma LLC
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided November 17, 2020No. 3:17-cv-05016Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 7 PUGET SOUNDKEEPER ALLIANCE, CASE NO. C17-5016 BHS 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART 9 v. AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S AND 10 APM TERMINALS TACOMA, LLC, et DEFENDANT’S MOTIONS FOR al., SUMMARY JUDGMENT 11 Defendants. 12 13 This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff Puget Soundkeeper Alliance’s 14 (“Soundkeeper”) motion for partial summary judgment, Dkt. 196, and Defendant Port of 15 Tacoma’s (“Port”) cross-motion for partial summary judgment, Dkt. 210. The Court has 16 considered the pleadings filed…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.