Legal Opinion
FRAGOSO v. PIAO
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided October 9, 2019No. 3:19-cv-06169Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY RICHARD FRAGOSO, : Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 19-6169(MAS)(ZNQ) v. | MEMORANDUM OPINION ZHEJUN PIAO, MIYEON CHOI and MASSAGE 4 ALL NJ 7, LLC, Defendants. This matter comes before the Court upon Defendants Zhejun Piao (“Piao”), Miyeon Choi (“Choi”), and Massage 4 All NJ 7, LLC’s (the “business”’) (collectively, “Defendants’”) Motion to Disqualify Counsel (the “Motion”). (Mot., ECF No. 21.) Plaintiff Richard Fragoso (“Plaintiff”) opposed (PI.’s Opp’n, ECF No. 22), and Defendants did not reply. The Court considers the parties’ contentions…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Dewey v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- Alexander v. Primerica Holdings, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
- Commonwealth Insurance v. Graphix Hot Line, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
- Gould, Inc. v. Mitsui Mining & Smelting Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1990
- INA Underwriters Insurance v. NalibotskyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.