Dimmick v. State
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DIMOND, Justice.
This is an appeal from a conviction of robbery.
At appellant’s trial Lee Herman testified that he and appellant committed the robbery. The first question raised is whether Herman’s testimony was corroborated by other evidence which tended to connect appellant with the commission of the crime.1
The victim, Richard Moyer, testified that he was robbed by two men. They were apparently masked, because he could not see their faces or hair. Moyer testified that he had known appellant because the latter had worked for him. Moyer said that he could identify appellant as one of the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Rogers v. RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- State v. VanceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1980
- Risher v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Pulakis v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
- Mallott v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
- Anthony v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.