Legal Opinion

Lawnichak v. Department of Treasury

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided December 26, 1995No. Docket 165910PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHoekstra, J.

Plaintiffs appeal as of right an order of the Court of Claims granting summary disposition in favor of defendant. We affirm.

The facts in this case are not in dispute. Plaintiffs are holders of royalty interests as lessors of mineral rights in oil or gas wells. Defendant is the state agency responsible for administering and collecting the severance tax, MCL 205.301 et seq.; MSA 7.351 et seq. Plaintiffs brought this action challenging the constitutionality of the severance tax act. In general, plaintiffs’ claims of unconstitutionality are predicated on amendments made to the severance tax act…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Advisory Opinion Re Constitutionality of 1972 PA 294Michigan Supreme Court · 1973
  2. C. F. Smith Co. v. FitzgeraldMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Cowen v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Brown v. Shell Oil Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Consumers Power Co. v. Association of Businesses Advocating Tariff EquityMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Phinney v. PerlmutterMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Gillette Commercial Operations North America & Subsidiaries v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. Hogg v. Four Lakes Association, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. Elenbaas v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API