Legal Opinion

Roblin v. Newmar Corporation

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided December 30, 2020No. 6:17-cv-01902Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON ROBERT ROBLIN, Plaintiff, No. 6:17-cv-01902-MC Vv. OPINION AND ORDER NEWMAR CORPORATION, Defendant. MCSHANE, Judge: Before the Court are cross-motions for partial summary judgment between Third-Party Plaintiff Newmar Corporation (“Newmar”) and Third-Party Defendant Freightliner Customer Chassis Corporation (“FCCC”). See ECF No.’s 171 & 173. Because the Customer Sales Agreement (“Agreement”) entitles Newmar to contractual indemnity, its Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (ECF No. 173) is GRANTED and FCCC’s Motion for Partial…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Hunt v. CromartieSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Michael Ryan v. TCI Architects/Engineers/Contractors, Inc. and BMH Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Craft MechanicalIndiana Supreme Court · 2017
  5. DaimlerChrysler Motors Co., LLC v. Manuel, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2012

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API