Roblin v. Newmar Corporation
District Court, D. Oregon
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON ROBERT ROBLIN, Plaintiff, No. 6:17-cv-01902-MC Vv. OPINION AND ORDER NEWMAR CORPORATION, Defendant. MCSHANE, Judge: Before the Court are cross-motions for partial summary judgment between Third-Party Plaintiff Newmar Corporation (“Newmar”) and Third-Party Defendant Freightliner Customer Chassis Corporation (“FCCC”). See ECF No.’s 171 & 173. Because the Customer Sales Agreement (“Agreement”) entitles Newmar to contractual indemnity, its Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (ECF No. 173) is GRANTED and FCCC’s Motion for Partial…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hunt v. CromartieSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Michael Ryan v. TCI Architects/Engineers/Contractors, Inc. and BMH Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Craft MechanicalIndiana Supreme Court · 2017
- DaimlerChrysler Motors Co., LLC v. Manuel, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.