Legal Opinion

In Re McAuliffe

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1987No. 63424PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Simon

The Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission (ARDC) charged the respondent with (1) conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, and misrepresentation, (2) illegal conduct involving moral turpitude, (3) conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice, and (4) making false statements to the ARDC with the intent to obstruct an inquiry. The charges stem from one central event — a settlement of a dispute over legal fees the respondent claimed were owing to him in which the respondent received a sum of money in exchange for a release and respondent’s recantation…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re HopperIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  2. In Re MitanIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
  3. In Re NeffIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  4. In Re CarrIllinois Supreme Court · 1941
  5. In Re NadlerIllinois Supreme Court · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re MitanIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
  2. In Re ChandlerIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
  3. In Re RosinIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
  4. In re JordanIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
  5. In Re ChandlerIllinois Supreme Court · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API