Legal Opinion

State v. Cofield

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 19, 1985No. 856SC327PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Chief Judge.

By Assignment of Error No. 4 based upon Exception No. 5, defendant contends the trial judge erred in failing to quash defendant’s indictment because discrimination against blacks in selection of grand jury foremen abridged defendant’s due process and equal protection rights as guaranteed by the North Carolina and United States Constitutions.

It is well settled that purposeful discrimination against blacks in the selection of grand jury foremen is forbidden by the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Rose v. Mitchell, 443 U.S. 545, 99 S.Ct. 2993, 61 L.Ed.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rose v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Hobby v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. State v. BlackwelderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  4. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  5. State v. PuckettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. AdamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  2. State v. CofieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  3. State v. JewellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  4. State v. GaryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  5. State v. AdamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API