Legal Opinion

Montagna v. O'HAGAN

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided October 23, 1975No. 75 Civ. 602PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

PLATT, District Judge.

Both parties have moved for summary judgment pursuant to FRCP 56; the plaintiff on the ground that there is no genuine issue of any material fact and that he is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, and the defendants on the ground that plaintiff’s complaint is barred by the Statute of Limitations and by res judicata and/or collateral estoppel.

Jurisdiction is allegedly obtained under Title 28 United States Code § 1343, and plaintiff alleges in his complaint that his “claim is predicated upon provisions of Title 42 United States Code § 1983, in that…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Moor v. County of AlamedaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Hoosier Cardinal Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gilliard v. New York Public Library SystemDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1984
  2. Perrotta v. IrizarryDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1977
  3. Jackson v. Alcan Sheet & PlateDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1978
  4. Lombard v. Board of Ed. of City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1976
  5. Ervin v. LanierDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API