Legal Opinion
Perrotta v. Irizarry
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 3, 1977No. 76 Civ. 2437PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT J. WARD, District Judge.
Defendant Philip Click (“Click”) moves for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P. Plaintiff Benjamin Perrotta (“Perrotta”) cross-moves for summary judgment against defendant Click and for a declaratory judgment against defendants Ivan Irizarry (“Irizarry”), Harry Tishelman (“Tishelman”), and Morton Bock (“Bock”) for failure to interpose an answer. 1 The record before the Court indicates that “there is no genuine issue of any material fact,” Rule 56(c), Fed.R.Civ.P., and for the reasons hereinafter stated, summary judgment is granted in favor of…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Griffin v. BreckenridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Lewis v. GreenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1986
- Eusebia Fernandez Etc. v. Honorable Jose Trias Monge Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
- Orshan v. AnkerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1980
- Oaks v. City of Fairhope, Ala.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 1981
- Beacon Syracuse Associates v. City of SyracuseDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1983
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.