Legal Opinion
MAXVILL-GLASCO DRILLING CO. INC. v. Royal Oil & Gas Corp.
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
Decided December 28, 1990No. 13-88-585-CVPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BENAVIDES, Justice.
This is an action for tortious interference with rights under an oil and gas lease. The trial court granted an instructed verdict for appellee, Royal Oil and Gas Corporation. Appellant, Maxvill-Glasco Drilling Company, Inc., raises two points of error asserting that the trial court erred in directing the verdict because there is evidence of damages and in refusing to admit testimony concerning an alleged oral addendum to the oil and gas lease. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Royal entered into an oil and gas lease with Mr. and Mrs. Foster covering 320 acres…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Southwest Battery Corp. v. OwenTexas Supreme Court · 1938
- Qantel Business Systems, Inc. v. Custom Controls Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1988
- Vance v. My Apartment Steak House of San Antonio, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
- American National Petroleum Co. v. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
- Bender v. BrooksTexas Supreme Court · 1910
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Southwestern Bell Media, Inc. v. Lyles, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1992
- Aquila Southwest Pipeline, Inc. v. Harmony Exploration, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2001
- Kelly v. Diocese of Corpus Christi, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1992
- MEMC Pasadena, Inc. v. Riddle Power, LLCCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
- Mark Palla v. Bio-One, Inc. Aydemir Arapoglu, and Transtrade, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2014
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.