Legal Opinion

Atlantic Mutual Insurance v. Commissioner

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 21, 1998No. 97-147PublishedCited by 95 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scalia

Property and casualty insurance companies maintain accounting reserves for “unpaid losses.” Under the Tax Reform Act of 1986, increases in loss reserves that constitute “reserve strengthening” do not qualify for a certain one-time tax benefit. We must decide whether the term “reserve strengthening” reasonably encompasses any increase in re serves, or only increases that result from changes in the methods or assumptions used to compute them.

HH

Atlantic Mutual Insurance Co. is the common parent of an affiliated group of corporations, including Centennial Insurance Co., a property and casualty…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Cottage Savings Assn. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Western National Mutual Insurance Company v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  4. Atlantic Mutual Insurance Company, and Includible Subsidiaries v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997

3Cited by95 opinions

  1. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Whitman v. American Trucking Assns., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. United States v. Haggar Apparel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Guedes v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, FirearmsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
  5. Friends of the Boundary Waters Wilderness v. DombeckCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999

90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API