Legal Opinion

Birrueta v. Department of Labor & Industries

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 2016No. 92215-2PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYu, J.

¶1 After the Department of Labor and Industries (Department) learned it had been overpaying respondent Jose Birrueta’s industrial insurance benefits for years, it issued two orders, one assessing an overpayment and another changing Birrueta’s status from married to unmarried for compensation purposes. Because Birrueta was overpaid due solely to an innocent misrepresentation about his marital status made on his behalf, we hold the Department’s orders were timely and authorized in accordance with RCW 51.32.240(1)(a). We therefore reverse the Court of Appeals and reinstate the ruling of the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Cockle v. Dept. of Labor and IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Cockle v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Marley v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1994

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Masco Corporation v. Alfredo SuarezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  2. McCaulley v. Dep't of Labor & Indus. of Wash.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  3. Joshua Peterson v. Wa State Dept. Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
  4. Michael P. Colasurdo Jr., V Esterline Technologies Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API