Legal Opinion

McCaulley v. Dep't of Labor & Indus. of Wash.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 25, 2018No. 76259-1-IPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchindler, J.

¶ 1 In 2007, the legislature enacted a pilot program for vocational rehabilitation and training of injured workers. LAWS OF 2007, ch. 72, § 2; RCW 51.32.099. After a vocational rehabilitation plan is approved, the worker can elect to participate, Option 1, or decide not to participate, Option 2.1 If a worker elects Option 2, the worker "is not entitled to further temporary total, or to permanent total, disability benefits except upon a showing of a worsening in the condition or conditions accepted under the claim such that claim closure is not appropriate."2 Danny McCaulley elected Option 2.…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Cockle v. Dept. of Labor and IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Cockle v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Lake v. Woodcreek Homeowners Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 2010

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kevin Miller, V State Of Wa, Dept. Of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2023
  2. Kevin Miller, V State Of Wa, Dept. Of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2023
  3. Theresia M. Rieman v. Department Of Labor And IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API