Legal Opinion
PDG Psychological, P.C. v. State Farm Insurance
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided June 23, 2005PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Bernice D. Siegal, J.
The above-captioned cases, all matters commenced by a provider of health services seeking reimbursement through New York’s No-Fault Insurance Law and upon which the plaintiffs sought to move this court for various relief (e.g., summary judgment), have been consolidated for the purpose of determining what, if any, sanctions pursuant to 22 NYCRR 130-1.1 should be imposed against plaintiffs’ counsel. The first six cases were consolidated and noticed for a hearing scheduled for April 15, 2005. The order, setting the matters down for a hearing, noted that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mary Immaculate Hospital v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Levy v. Carol Management Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- A.B. Medical Services PLLC v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2004
- DeRosa v. Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Vicom, Inc. v. Silverwood Development, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rosado v. Edmundo Castillo Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- In re BanniettisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- In re BanniettisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012