Legal Opinion

Bowles v. Kinsey

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided September 17, 1993No. Record 921720PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Keenan

In this will construction case, we consider whether the trial court erred in construing the term “personal property” to include only tangible personal property.

Wilson H. Kinsey and Joyce S. Kinsey (the trustees), co-executors and co-trustees of the estate of Clara S. Cromer (the testatrix), filed a bill of complaint to construe the testatrix’s will. At issue in the will, which was drafted by an attorney, are two provisions relating to the disposition of the testatrix’s personal property. The first provision, in Article IV, states: “I hereby give, devise and bequeath all my personal property…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. LeRoy v. KirkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  2. Thomas v. CopenhaverSupreme Court of Virginia · 1988
  3. Waring v. Bosher's Adm'rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
  4. Pitman v. RutledgeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1956
  5. Powell v. HollandSupreme Court of Virginia · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Turner v. ReedSupreme Court of Virginia · 1999
  2. Britt v. SurrattSalem County Circuit Court · 2005
  3. F. & M. Bank v. Trustees of the Front Royal United Methodist ChurchWarren County Circuit Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API