Legal Opinion

Morgan, Melhuish, Monaghan, Arvidson, Abrutyn & Lisowski v. Republic National Bank

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided February 23, 1994PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Order entered August 27, 1993 affirmed, with $10 costs.

We agree that the defendant depositary-collecting bank failed to demonstrate the existence of a genuine question of fact requiring a trial on the issue of the commercial reasonableness of its conduct in accepting the substantial ($150,000) two-party check over a facially irregular, forged indorsement of the plaintiff payee, a noncustomer of the bank. Defendant’s conclusory allegation that it "employed generally accepted commercial practices and standards in connection with the negotiation of the check” lacked any…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Tette v. Marine Midland BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  2. Heffernan v. Norstar BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Valley National Bank v. P.A.Y. Check CashingNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004
  2. Lawyers' Fund v. Gateway State BankNew York Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Crick v. HSBC Bank USACivil Court of the City of New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API