Legal Opinion
Builders Steel Co. v. Marshall
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided May 17, 1978No. 77-1589PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HEANEY, Circuit Judge.
Builders Steel Company seeks review of a decision of an administrative law judge which found Builders in violation of occupational safety regulation 29 C.F.R. § 1926.-105(a).1 The decision became the final order of the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission (Commission) when no member directed its review within the statutory time period. 29 U.S.C. § 661(i); 29 C.F.R. § 2200.90(b)(3). Builders was assessed a penalty of $500.
The facts are largely undisputed. On September 23,1976, Builders was constructing a warehouse for the Sony Corporation in Kansas City,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Budd Co. v. Occupational Safety & Health Review CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Clarkson Construction Company v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission and Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
- Brennan v. Southern Contractors ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Arkansas-Best Freight Systems, Inc. v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission and the Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
- Long Manufacturing Co., N. C., Inc. v. Occupational Safety & Health Review Commission and F. Ray Marshall, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- The Coca-Cola Company v. The Atchison, Topeka, and Santa Fe Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Diebold, Inc. v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
- Brock v. L.R. Willson & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- Smith v. SorensenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
- Donovan v. Adams Steel Erection, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.